Bad Reviews Part 2: What To Do About Them

By -

If you're a writer, whether you're just starting out or you've sold millions of copies, this is what you should do when someone makes public their poor opinion of your masterpiece in the form of a bad review:

NOTHING.

Bad reviews go with the territory for writers. We have to accept it as an occupational hazard, shrug our shoulders and move on. In fact, in this blog post from last year I advocate sending them chocolate.

In reality, of course, we agonise over our poor reviews, dwell on them constantly, analyse them, mourn the loss of our writing dream, and finally convince ourselves that writing the book was all just a big waste of time. Some writers protest them in the comments, or get their supportive friends to do so. Some plead with the reviewer to retract the review. I even heard of one author appealing to Amazon to get a bad review taken down. (Wow, wouldn't it be great if we could delete all our bad reviews!)

Be warned - engaging with the reviewer looks petulant and petty, unless it's to politely thank them for their time and honesty. Not only does it achieve nothing, but it harms our public image, and that matters. In fact, give the bad reviews the same treatment you do the good ones. In my case, that means posting them on my Facebook page and thanking the reviewer. (But no longer sending them chocolate.)

For the avoidance of doubt, I welcome all reviews of my books, good and bad, from those who have actually read them. And the picture which accompanies this blog is of my worst review. Feel free to go and read it properly - here's the link.

The best ever gracious response to a review I got was from Wm. Paul Young. I hated The Shack and gave it just one star on Amazon. But a year later Young's publicist contacted me and asked me to review his second book on my blog and on Amazon and Goodreads. She even sent me a free, pre-publication hardback copy. Now that's respect for an opinion. Unfortunately I didn't think much of the second book either.

Comments

  1. Anonymous12 February 2013 at 02:33

    Hi Anna, it is really hard to ignore bad reviews, but as you say, they go with the territory. Maybe the character being most developed by a writer is our own. Anne Stenhouse

    ReplyDelete
  2. Stephanie Black12 February 2013 at 06:57

    Great insights, Anna. Bad reviews ARE painful, but as you said, it's part of being an author, and reacting defensively just makes the author--not the reviewer--look bad.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anna Maria Junus12 February 2013 at 14:21

    Great advice. I think the natural inclination is to go into defense mode, but you're right. The best thing to do is nothing or a polite acknowledgement.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Importance of Reviews - and Chocolate

By -
In my last blog I talked about the expense of publicity and why, therefore, it is important to attract readers through other means. Social networking, blogging and and just being "out there" apparently helps people to know your name and have an interest in your work. A gripping, intriguing and well-written back cover blurb is vital, but personally I think you can't beat reviews and recommendations. If someone else has read the book and loved it - especially if they are someone I know and trust - then there's a good chance I'll want to read it too. When a potential buyer is considering the book on Amazon a good review might be the difference between clicking "buy" or not. To this end, I have a proposal. The "Chocolate and Reviews for Books" proposal Here's how it works: You, the author, email me a word document of your book (to anna [at] buttimore [dot] org [dot] uk - and include your postal address in the email). I post you a bar of British...
Read more

I Wore a Skirt to Church on Sunday

By -
Image
I'm very grateful to have permission to reproduce here something by Carrie Stringham Teasdale. I've never met Carrie, but her words had quite an impression on me so I sought her out to ask whether I could share them on my blog.  As background this past Sunday, 16th December, was designated by a group of Mormon feminists as "Wear Pants [Trousers] to Church Day". They felt that being required to wear a skirt or dress to church is indicative of the oppressive and patronising attitude in the LDS church towards women. Now, whilst I'll readily admit that it is a patriarchal church, I personally have never felt less valued or respected in it, or in any way inferior to my brothers in Christ's church. I also only ever wear skirts or dresses because I find them way more comfortable than trousers. In fact, I don't currently own a pair of trousers (that fit). I have held some pretty major callings (on the Stake Public Affairs Council, YW President, Primary Preside...
Read more

Why Muslims Don't Like Us

By -
Image
Imagine, for just a moment, that you grew up in a world where everyone believes in God and respects His laws. Your culture, society and traditions are based entirely on God's holy directives, and the lives of all citizens are dedicated to following His path. In your society the fallen nature of man is well understood, in particular with reference to his carnal desires, and so your society protects men from themselves (and women from men) by putting in place strict rules and laws. Sex outside marriage is illegal. Women are protected from leers and lasciviousness by a protective barrier of fabric which they wear whenever they are among men. This "safety barrier" covers them from their glossy and alluring hair down to their fine ankles, so that no man can look upon them with lust. Maybe they are accompanied by a husband, father or brother, or some other man who can protect them whenever they venture out. Women know that their bodies are sacred and to be enjoyed, visually a...
Read more