Bad Reviews Part 3: How To Write Them

By -
Okay, I admit, this is slightly different from the previous two posts in this series as it's not so much about how to write a review of a book you didn't like, but about how to write a bad book review.
  1. Start by outlining the plot of the book. Be sure to include all the spoilers and plot twists you can, including what happens in the end. Make sure this summary of the action comprises about 90% of your review. You could even include the descriptive blurb from the back of the book if you like, just in case readers of your review haven't already looked at that.
  2. Explain at length what books you like reading and who your favourite authors are, and what genres most interest you and why. 
  3. If you didn't like the book, be sure to explain that you didn't like it because it's not a genre you like to read and you only picked it up because it was free/a present/you liked the cover.
  4. If the book goes against your political views, religious or cultural beliefs in any way, then it is a Bad Book and should only get one star.
  5. Conversely if you know the author, or your best friend's cousin's daughter's roommate knows the author, then you are duty bound to give it five stars.
  6. Remember that you don't have to read the whole book to review it, just the free ebook sample. Obviously no book ever got better after the first three chapters.
  7. Try not to mention things like writing style, plot complexity, character construction or voice because readers of reviews (and books) really don't understand or care about that stuff.
  8. If it has done very well and made the author very rich (richer than you) then it's fine to be really critical and horrible about the book (even if you secretly quite liked it) so that the author doesn't get too big headed. Remember, the more successful they are, the fewer feelings they have to be hurt by bad reviews.
  9. Don't worry about grammar, spelling and punctuation in your review. Good spelling and grammar is the author's job, not yours.
  10. You might like to use "texttalk" like, "If u r thinking of buying this book 4 sum1..." because there's a limit on how much space you have for your review.
  11. If you didn't like the book don't worry about giving reasons why not or explaining which parts were weak. After all, it's just a matter of taste, isn't it? It's not as though it would help the author because he's probably never going to write another book anyway.

Comments

  1. Anna Maria Junus19 February 2013 at 08:34

    And don't forget to complain about how long it took to get the book from Amazon and what condition it arrived in - because that has to be the author's fault.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Importance of Reviews - and Chocolate

By -
In my last blog I talked about the expense of publicity and why, therefore, it is important to attract readers through other means. Social networking, blogging and and just being "out there" apparently helps people to know your name and have an interest in your work. A gripping, intriguing and well-written back cover blurb is vital, but personally I think you can't beat reviews and recommendations. If someone else has read the book and loved it - especially if they are someone I know and trust - then there's a good chance I'll want to read it too. When a potential buyer is considering the book on Amazon a good review might be the difference between clicking "buy" or not. To this end, I have a proposal. The "Chocolate and Reviews for Books" proposal Here's how it works: You, the author, email me a word document of your book (to anna [at] buttimore [dot] org [dot] uk - and include your postal address in the email). I post you a bar of British...
Read more

I Wore a Skirt to Church on Sunday

By -
Image
I'm very grateful to have permission to reproduce here something by Carrie Stringham Teasdale. I've never met Carrie, but her words had quite an impression on me so I sought her out to ask whether I could share them on my blog.  As background this past Sunday, 16th December, was designated by a group of Mormon feminists as "Wear Pants [Trousers] to Church Day". They felt that being required to wear a skirt or dress to church is indicative of the oppressive and patronising attitude in the LDS church towards women. Now, whilst I'll readily admit that it is a patriarchal church, I personally have never felt less valued or respected in it, or in any way inferior to my brothers in Christ's church. I also only ever wear skirts or dresses because I find them way more comfortable than trousers. In fact, I don't currently own a pair of trousers (that fit). I have held some pretty major callings (on the Stake Public Affairs Council, YW President, Primary Preside...
Read more

Why Muslims Don't Like Us

By -
Image
Imagine, for just a moment, that you grew up in a world where everyone believes in God and respects His laws. Your culture, society and traditions are based entirely on God's holy directives, and the lives of all citizens are dedicated to following His path. In your society the fallen nature of man is well understood, in particular with reference to his carnal desires, and so your society protects men from themselves (and women from men) by putting in place strict rules and laws. Sex outside marriage is illegal. Women are protected from leers and lasciviousness by a protective barrier of fabric which they wear whenever they are among men. This "safety barrier" covers them from their glossy and alluring hair down to their fine ankles, so that no man can look upon them with lust. Maybe they are accompanied by a husband, father or brother, or some other man who can protect them whenever they venture out. Women know that their bodies are sacred and to be enjoyed, visually a...
Read more